Spreading hope is beautiful Japan ~ 's blog
http://jut-zero.wix.com/social-media-blog#!%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E3%81%AE%E3%80%8C%E6%A0%B8% E6% AD% A6% E8% A3% 85% E3% 80% 8D% E3% 82% 92% E8% 80% 83% E3% 81% 88% E3% 82% 8B% E2% 91% A2-% E6 % 97% A5% E6% 9C% AC% E3% 81% AE% E3% 80% 8C% E6% A0% B8% E6% AD% A6% E8% A3% 85% E3% 80% 8D% E3% 82 % 92% E8% 80% 83% E3% 81% 88% E3% 81% A6% E3% 81% 84% E3% 82% 8B% E3% 81% AE% E3% 81% AF% E3% 83% 88 % E3% 83% A9% E3% 83% B3% E3% 83% 97% E5% 80% 99% E8% A3% 9C% E3% 81% A0% E3% 81% 91% E3% 81% A7% E3 % 81% AF% E3% 81% AA% E3% 81% 84% EF% BC% 81% E6% 88% 91% E3% 80% 85% E3% 81% 8C% E7% 9F% A5% E3% 81 % A3% E3% 81% A6% E3% 81% 8A% E3% 81% 8F% E3% 81% B9% E3% 81% 8D% E7% B1% B3% E5% 9B% BD% E9% 80% A3 % E9% 82% A6% E8% AD% B0% E4% BC% 9A% E4% B8% 8A% E9% 99% A2% E5% A4% 96% E4% BA% A4% E5% A7% 94% E5 % 93% A1% E4% BC% 9A% E3% 81% A7% E3% 81% AE% E7% 99% BD% E7% 86% B1% E8% AD% B0% E8% AB% 96% EF% BC % 81 / c1aod / 5708f0110cf2ecf50ee8db39
Quote
However, March 7 days immediately after the, now is the Senate, yet a number of lawmakers and the old and new government officials in the big stage of national politics that the Foreign Affairs Committee of the highest institution of the legislature had discussed.
This stage was a public hearing entitled Senate Foreign Relations Committee the entire open "US policy toward North Korea."
Hearing about the foreign policy issues of this kind, one of the sub-committee, which is more than one at the bottom of the Foreign Relations Committee in the same Senate is almost be organized. But I committee entire mother becomes the organizers on important themes. By the way, on the Foreign Relations Committee have joined the Democratic, Republican Party lawmakers a total of 20 people.
The hearing was the subject of the title street, whether it should deal with North Korea to continue carrying out the experiment of the explosion of fire and nuclear weapons of long-range ballistic missile the United States is discussed. The theme of "nuclear armament of Japan" has time and again in the flow, it was discussed.
[The United States is a large sense of crisis to develop nuclear weapons of North Korea]
To summarize the gist of the discussion in the first, made in the following manner.
"The US should prevent any time by what the equipment to the nuclear-armed, especially long-range ballistic missile nuclear warheads in North Korea. But also interactive so far of negotiations pressure also sanctions had no effect. Now North Korea's nuclear armed actually to have a blocking can be a force in a non-military means is only in China. "
"As China's fear most now is a nuclear-armed Japan. So if presenting a scenario that nuclear armament of Japan in China, China will stop becoming seriously nuclear-armed North Korea."
"On the other hand, North Korea and is like being recognized by the international community as a weapon states of nuclear weapons, is not could occur movement to the nucleus armed with the Japanese side. The US government is also in the proponent of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) Yes, it is opposed to nuclear weapons in Japan, but when the north of the nuclear-armed became overt reality, would also be discussed again the US side a possibility that Japan has a nucleus. "
Whatever the purpose, Japan nuclear-armed scenario of such as itself, it's inevitable that ferocious rebound occurs in Japan. The weight of the history of "sacrificial countries of the only nuclear weapons in the world" will be noted.
"Three non-nuclear principles" are also living, are supported from a number of public school.
So even from the point of view of the reality of national security, will fierce criticism boils the word Japan nuclear-armed and the like.
Even also hypothesis of the hypothesis, the assumption that Japan has a nuclear weapons, could be a crime seen just to express it.
But on the other hand, the immediate vicinity of the rogue state of North Korea while taking a hostile policy to Japan and the United States, it has been rush to the development of nuclear warhead missile. Not left to the US government and Congress think while trying to desperately stopping the spread of the lawless nation of its nuclear weapons, in which the situation is serious, North Korea means of prevention of nuclear armed or deterrence of means, talk about the assumption that Japan's nuclear armament as. This also is reality of that can not be ignored.
Situation in which the nuclear-armed North Korea is also a proof of the things that has generated so much of the sense of crisis in the United States.
Even such a reality of the US side is to learn how much rebound in the Japanese side, I should know as a phenomenon that actually happened at stake in the security policy of the country. Development of nuclear weapons of North Korea is also in East Asia to the United States, and Japan and also the fact that began to throw so much a huge impact in the US relationship.
Cited above
According to the Wikipedia,
"Does not have a nuclear weapon, not made" for the two items on the possession and manufacture of Japan's own nuclear weapons, 1955 has been the US and nuclear power cooperation agreement the day entered into (1955), Atomic Energy of domestic law which received it the basic Law and, International Atomic Energy agency (IAEA), are legally prohibited by ratification, such as the nuclear nonproliferation Treaty (NPT).
For the three non-nuclear principles it is in the Diet resolution, but not in the law and treaties, which is that there is no legally binding is to be one of the three non-nuclear principles "do not bring in nuclear weapons."
To say no, it means that you have to give up ownership. From countries that have nuclear weapons, be borrowed for a fee or free of charge it is not denied. With the help of nuclear weapons in the inclusive use rights from the United States, not against the three non-nuclear principles to be brought into the territorial waters receive on the high seas.
In addition, there is a idea of revenge rights. In Japan, which dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki thing to say that there is a right to use the two nuclear weapons. This is, or be limited to nuclear weapons 2 shots of the power of the same level, or typing anything shot in two places, whether or typing anything shot twice. Hata also, whether the partner is limited to the United States, what can be extended to former Allied countries, whether it is able to adapt to now of the Allies, that the United Nations member countries.
"Borrowed without, without, without revenge." Will should be considered.
While watching the assassination classroom two terms ♯1
