2016 House of Councillors election

Is the correct recognition of history ~ 's blog

http://deliciousicecoffee.blog28.fc2.com/blog-entry-6286.html?sp

quotation

    While vote counting of the House of Councillors election progresses, he told the willingness of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of the Liberal Democratic Party, which was to ensure the victory is, "I want to change, including everything from the preamble" to the overall constitutional amendment.

Japan because the Constitution is after all is a constitutional pressing in violation of international law by the occupation forces, but it is "want to change, including everything from the preamble," the thing that told the willingness of the overall constitutional amendment, of course Prime Minister Abe .

However, if the occupation forces in violation of international law is the Constitution that was pressing, rather than amend Better yet, it such should be discarded with the declared invalid.

Occupation forces, such as the GHQ is supposed to be that should not be modified or created the laws of the country that are occupied.

The enactment of the Constitution, "the occupation is to respect the current law of the occupied territories, to recover ensure public order and life ..." was a clear violation of the the international law (Hague Convention).

"Occupying forces, occupation should not be or change made a national law that is" because, an international rule that does not change at all even now be at that time.

Commitment to "constitutional reform", it does not destroy the Constitution pressing by the occupying forces, and leaving a big root of evil for the future.

Cited above

    I also, the current Constitution is not to "revision", "freeze" or "destruction" is I think that it is reasonable.