Newspaper or newspapers had reported how the nine-dotted line of China?

Newspaper or newspapers was reported as how the nine-dotted line of China?

Nihon Keizai Shimbun

http://mw.nikkei.com/sp/#!/article/DGXLASGM12H5B_S6A710C1000000/

quotation

Brussels = at Manabu Morimoto] trial Philippines around the marine advance of China has been sued in the South China Sea, the Court of Arbitration of The Hague is 12 days, international in the "nine-dotted line" that China defines the sovereignty of almost the entire sea area certified that there is no basis on the law. The first time that international judicial decision comes out in this area to the assertion of China to promote the artificial island construction and militarization, was observed accused of plaintiff Philippines. Such as Japan and the United States and the littoral states is likely strengthen the criticism of China.

Cited above

Asahi Shimbun

http://www.asahi.com/sp/articles/ASJ7D640PJ7DUHBI02P.html?iref=sp_int_asia_list_n

quotation

Countries Tour of the problem the South China Sea to fight for sovereignty, Netherlands The Hague Permanent Court of Arbitration is 12 days, out of the ruling that China has its own border to claim the right "nine-stage line" is that there is no basis under international law did. First judicial decisions over the South China Sea issue. Validity of such artificial island construction that China is advancing, this on the international law is no longer observed.

China is poised to not accept the verdict. Although means are not to be forced to implement the ruling, it's inevitable the criticism of the international community is enhanced if ignored.

Arbitration is the Philippines, such as the construction of the claim and the artificial island of China of rights with respect to the South China Sea had been raised as a "violation of international law".

Cited above

Mainichi Newspapers

http://mainichi.jp/articles/20160713/ddm/001/030/199000c

quotation

For almost the entire area to extend the sovereignty and interests and the Chinese claim of the South China Sea, the Philippines is in the arbitration court, which was alleged to confirm the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea violation, the Court of Arbitration of The Hague is 12 days, China claims for has been the basis "nine-dotted line", ruled that the "legal basis is not in the historic right to claim China is about resources," acknowledged the claim of the Philippines. The motion to proceed with effective control in the South China Sea of ​​the artificial island, in a form close to the international law, "the entire surface of the losing" of the "no" was confronted China, the Chinese government has strong opposition.

For the first time judgment based on the international law Tour of the assertion of China's it is issued.

China is the past, and has jurisdiction over the waters of the inside of the nine-dotted line, this has been argued that "historical rights" from the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea entered into force (1994) and earlier. In contrast, the Philippines, which has fought sovereignty over the South China Sea reef is 2013, it claims China had filed an arbitration court as "invalid and contrary to the Convention."

In the ruling, same cross-sectional as "China in the South China Sea there is no evidence that has been the exclusive management" and "historical rights" of China's claim to nine-dotted line, he rejected the claims of China.

China is against the background of the claims of the nine-dotted line, do the artificial island construction in seven of the reef of Nansha (English name Spratly) Islands, has been criticized for promoting the construction military bases the like runway. By the ruling, as the "United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea violation" for it to continue the construction, there is a high possibility that criticism of the international community is stronger.

In the judgment further, for seven of the reef, both certified and can be set exclusive economic zone (EEZ) is not the "island", "rock" or "low tide highlands". As a result, the sovereign rights of resource development in the surrounding waters also China can no longer be claimed.

Ruling also, the landfill and the artificial island construction in seven of the reef, given the serious damage to the coral reefs of the environment, was certified to be in violation of environmental protection obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

Cited above

The Yomiuri Shimbun

http://sp.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20160712-OYT1T50113.html

quotation

In arbitration the Philippines sued as such [Hague = Yuya Yokobori, Manila = Yuko Mukai] assertion of sovereignty in the South China Sea of ​​China is in violation of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the Court of Arbitration of The Hague is 12 days, nearly surrounds the South China Sea writes border "nine-dotted line" showed the ruling, and the like "There is no legal basis to claim a historic right."

The first time judgment based on international law to China's claims over the South China Sea has been shown that claims of the Philippines was observed almost. China is poised to ignore the ruling, but will be the basis of the claim over the sovereignty is negative, it's inevitable to be dire diplomatic tough position.

Had become a major focal point in the appeal, and the legal basis of the "nine-dotted line", China is the legal position of the artificial island to proceed with construction in the South China Sea in the Spratly (Nansha) Islands

Paid article below

Cited above

Sankei Shimbun

http://www.sankei.com/world/news/160712/wor1607120035-n1.html

quotation

For arbitration proceedings that the Philippines has sought China's claims and actions in [Berlin = Hideo Miyashita] South China Sea as it is the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea violation, the Court of Arbitration of The Hague is 12 days, China was set to own a wide range of the South China Sea It issued a ruling to be certified as "There is no legal basis" in the "nine-dotted line". In the first international judicial judgment against aggressive marine advance of China, China's assertion that the "historical rights" has been denied.

Ruling can not appeal in a definitive judgment. China is in a position to ignore consistently, but means it is not to conform to the forced arbitration, such as penalties, increase the pressure the international community to seek the respect of judicial decisions is inevitable. While China's position is painful, the South China Sea situation is likely to be more tense.

Although the Court of Arbitration had reserves whether or not to hear the nine-dotted line, arbitrage is certified as "having the jurisdiction." For waters and resources on in the Kudan line that, to claim that pointed out that "China is history, there is no evidence that has been exclusive control", over the interests of the nine-dotted line "historic rights", "Law it is determined that the evidence is not. "

Arbitration, including each reef that China's effective control, Spratly (Chinese name, Nansha) Islands, rather than all "islands" reefs of, and without a 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone (EEZ) "rock", submerged at the time of high tide territorial waters of 12 nautical miles to be certified as "low tide highlands" that does not occur.

Ruling is also, due to interference and artificial island construction of the country's fishing vessels in the EEZ of the Philippines, it determined that China has violated the sovereignty of the Philippines. And landfill by China has undermined a large ecosystem of coral reefs, was certified a breach of duty with respect to environmental protection in China.

Arbitration in January 2013, started in response to the petition of the Philippines. China has refused to participate, but the oral argument in China vent was opened in November last year.

Cited above

   For at least the papers facts, it has been accurately reported. Asahi Shimbun had been prejudice and what to report with more Chinese shoulder. orz