Asovereign as a nation

 anti-Japanese forces ~ 's blog

http://ponko69.blog118.fc2.com/blog-category-19.html?sp

Quote

... While suggesting that the Hasegawa is the sovereignty there is also a sovereignty of the state not only the sovereignty of the people in plain text

It is necessary to maintain the sovereignty of the nation ●

● for themselves is "sovereign" is, there is a duty to protect their own their own sovereignty

● it is necessary to sovereign education for that, is the personality education itself is the real sovereign education

It has said.

Although "Japan die!" The anti-Japanese forces are using the overthrow of the Abe administration, really correct either.

I think while long copy and paste pardon for example as in the archive!

⇒ Sankei Shimbun (2016/4/1)

[Rightly]

The sovereign education in the true meaning Saitama University professor emeritus Michiko Hasegawa

Anti-Japanese 0001

Because now that the right to vote can be seen from 18-year-old, for you will do that, now suddenly the word "sovereignty education" be heard. If you really and I need something called "sovereign education", there is a funny story also afresh panic of, but in a sense this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Whether such does it mean to be a "sovereign", and therefore what kind of attitude is needed is to, if the opportunity to think about all the people is carefully, there is no such a good thing.

To do so, first the "sovereignty" you need to know exactly what is. It does not even supposed to be able to, such as "sovereign education" remains not know it. Especially this word "sovereignty" was coined to translate the Western language to the Meiji period, because it is one of the so-called translation language, I need to make sure of the Naonokoto carefully meaning.

Lack of awareness of "govern who"

The term "sovereignty", a big source of Latin is a word meaning "best power". In Japan, the best of the power over the people take charge of the politics. Externally, maintained their independence of the country, invasion of other countries, says that the force that does not succumb to the intervention.

In French the word for the first time clearly defined the 16th century, but the king was grasps the domestic sovereignty "monarch sovereignty", reversed it in the French Revolution of the late 18th century made in the "sovereignty of the people". This it has also become a first principle of modern democracy that has been adopted now of Japan's Constitution.

Or for a distant memory at this time is still ingrained within people's minds, the "sovereignty of the people", ie, people who are thinking poses "not (no)" to the government, is to defeat the government, and not a few. However, it is not so simple. Under the sovereignty of the people the people is not a person who is simply dominated. There are also those who govern at the same time that a person is governed. This is the a place difficult.

Of course, under the current so-called parliamentary democracy, will be representative of the people is their chosen in elections preside over the politics, as those who are governed and those who govern in the top of the form and is in conflict also it looks. However, the representative is merely representative of your choice us, be remembered that the "sovereignty of the people" is not true. For example, a person such as that thought, "Abe Stop" may be Re "Japan die" and abusive Nonoshi (Nonoshi) every time that something there is a complaint, it can not be said that far from "sovereign". It is tucked into one of the exclusively their "reign are those who" must Ne said that attitude you are throwing great pains of the "sovereignty".

Knowing the difficulty of political management

If you found the any problems, just without than "angry", if I get what can solve the problem, consider hard. Then, even in the visible problems no matter how simple likely, the actual resolution you will see that the terrible pains it takes. To say to bite such as "politics for the people", it comes found that whether the work that requires no matter how complicated steering.

True of the "sovereign education" will must be to foster the kind of intellectual attitude. Nothing, there is no need to know in advance a solution for all the problems. Rather, such a thing is to know that it's not possible with work of man. Reality of political management is knowing have realized how difficult thing of - That is the important.

Sovereign who was wearing that kind of idea, when choosing a representative of their own also, simply should no longer be a stupid choice was allowed to anger. It is for young people, responsible there should also be training to wear the adult of the idea, it is the real sovereign education it's also in the personality education itself.

The retention does not succumb to the other countries of the "power"

And the other one, there is an important indispensable to the true sovereign education. As we saw earlier, there are two aspects of the inner and the outer is the word "sovereignty", who not only say that either have a "best power" in the country, maintained its independence in the international community, that have a not succumb to other countries "force" is, is another important meaning of "sovereignty".

And lose the "sovereignty" in this sense, in the interior of the country, also does not hold even national sovereignty no longer monarch sovereignty. How much even as a national one person one person tries to politics may squeeze the head, there is no addition to succumb to interfere with the compression of the other countries, become that. There is that prevent it thing called "defense force", that's why all over the world in any country, you must hold the "power" of the minimum to maintain the national sovereignty.

Even the Constitution of Panama that does not have an army, the people have an obligation to fight in order to maintain the country's independence, it is clearly that. For themselves is "sovereign" is, that he has an obligation to protect their own their national sovereignty - this is the point of another important "sovereign education".

We would like to come to realize firmly based was true of the "sovereign education" these two points. (Saitama University professor emeritus Michiko Hasegawa Michiko Hasegawa)

(End quote)

Cited above

    So we have two of the meaning of the inside and outside to sovereignty. In Japan, the sense of who has the sovereignty. In the outside, meaning of as a force that holds the country's independence. Manchuria, Uygur, Tibet, and South Mongolia, I mean that was not able to maintain its sovereignty.

While watching the Utawarerumono ♯16